RESUMO
The catalytic behavior of CO hydrogenation can be modulated by metal-support interactions, while the role of the support remains elusive. Herein, we demonstrate that the presence of strong metal-support interactions (SMSI) depends strongly on the crystal phase of TiO2 (rutile or anatase) and the treatment conditions for the TiO2 support, which could critically control the activity and selectivity of Ru-based nanocatalysts for CO hydrogenation. High CO conversion and olefin selectivity were observed for Ru/rutile-TiO2 (Ru/r-TiO2), while catalysts supported by anatase (a-TiO2) showed almost no activity. Characterization confirmed that the SMSI effect could be neglected for Ru/r-TiO2, while it is dominant on Ru/a-TiO2 after reduction at 300 °C, resulting in the coverage of Ru nanoparticles by TiOx overlayers. Such SMSI could be suppressed by H2 treatment of the a-TiO2 support and the catalytic activity of the as-obtained Ru/a-TiO2(H2) can be greatly elevated from almost inactive to >50% CO conversion with >60% olefin selectivity. Further results indicated that the surface reducibility of the TiO2 support determines the SMSI state and catalytic performance of Ru/TiO2 in the CO hydrogenation reaction. This work offers an effective strategy to design efficient catalysts for the FTO reaction by regulating the crystal phase of the support.
RESUMO
The adsorptions of iron(II) phthalocyanine (FePc) on graphene and defective graphene were investigated systematically using density functional theory. Three types of graphene defects covering stone-wales (SW), single vacancy (SV), and double vacancy (DV) were taken into account, in which DV defects included DV(5-8-5), DV(555-777), and DV(5555-6-7777). The calculations of formation energies of defects showed that the SW defect has the lowest formation energy, and it was easier for DV defects to form compared with the SV defect. It is more difficult to rotate or move FePc on the surface of defective graphenes than on the surface of graphene due to bigger energy differences at different sites. Although the charge analysis indicated the charge transfers from graphene or defective graphene to FePc for all studied systems, the electron distributions of FePc on various defective graphenes were different. Especially for FePc@SV, the d xy orbital of Fe in the conduction band moved toward the Fermi level about 1 eV, and the d xz of Fe in the valence band for FePc@SV also moved toward the Fermi level compared with FePc@graphene and other FePc@defective graphenes. Between the planes of FePc and defective graphene, the electron accumulation occurs majorly in the position of the FePc molecular plane for FePc@SW, FePc@DV(5-8-5), and FePc@DV(5555-6-7777) as well as FePc@graphene. However, electrons were accumulated on the upper and lower surfaces of the FePc molecular plane for FePc@SV and FePc@DV(555-777). Thus, the electron distribution of FePc can be modulated by introducing the interfaces of different defective graphenes.
